Skip to content

Examples of Good Practices

Good Practice 1 ‚Bujna Warszawa’ (‚Luxuriant Warsaw’) Programme
Brief description of good practice The programme aims to increase the number of community gardens in Warsaw and thus the number of high-quality green spaces in the city. It promotes standards and principles that improve the environmental and social benefits created by community gardens. These standards include, among others, a requirement to make gardens accessible to the public, a ban on the use of inorganic pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers, and anti-discriminatory practices.

 

Duration:

The ‚Bujna Warszawa ‘programme began in 2017 and continues today, with a growing number of engaged community gardens.

 

Aims:

Increasing the number of community gardens in Warsaw. Improving the quality of green spaces in the city. Promoting biodiversity, access to green space, social cohesion and participatory management.

 

Implementation:

Cooperation of the Warsaw Greenery Board with the NGO Pracownia Dóbr Wspólnych and local organisations. Organisation of workshops, festivals, material and advisory support for gardens. Promotion of ecological standards and anti-discrimination practices. Introduction of principles of democratic self-governance in gardens.

Target group of the good practice The target group of the ‚Bujna Warszawa’ programme includes a wide range of Warsaw residents, regardless of age, background or specific needs. The programme is particularly aimed at people interested in community gardening, ecology and sustainability. Participants range from families with children to seniors to young adults and students. All are united by a desire to actively participate in the creation and maintenance of urban green spaces and to engage with local communities.
Partners / Actors of good practice Warsaw Greenery Board: Main initiator of the programme, aiming to increase the number of community gardens and improve the quality of green spaces in Warsaw.

NGO Pracownia Dóbr Wspólnych: An organisation working with the Greenery Board, specialising in developing projects related to social well-being and the management of common goods.

Foundation for Community Consultation: An organisation supporting new community gardens to develop principles of communication and collaboration.

Council of Community Gardens: A team consisting of representatives of Warsaw gardens, actively involved in the implementation of some elements of the programme, e.g. the evaluation of applications for material support.

 

The cooperation between these actors is based on the common goal of developing community gardens in Warsaw and on complementing each other’s knowledge and resources. The Greenery Board provides institutional support, Pracownia Dóbr Wspólnych brings experience in community management, Foundation for Community Consultation provides support in communication and collaboration, and the Council of Community Gardens represents the direct voice of the garden communities.

Success factors and difficulties / barriers to good practice Success factors

•       Cross-sectoral cooperation: Effective partnerships between city authorities, NGOs and local communities.

•       Involvement of local communities: Direct participation of local residents in the creation and management of the gardens.

•       Educational and material support: Workshops, advice, materials and expert support.

•       Promotion of sustainable gardening practices: Organic standards and best cultivation practices.

 

Difficulties / Barriers

•       Funding: Secure a steady source of funding for continued support of the gardens.

•       Maintaining continuity and engagement: Maintain continued interest and activity in garden communities.

•       Diverse community needs: Tailoring support to meet the diverse needs of the various community groups participating in the programme.

•       Management and coordination: Preserving effective organisation and coordination of activities between different partners and stakeholders.

How can this good practice be linked to the CIVIC GREEN project, its scope and its activities? This good practice can be inspiring for the CIVICGREEN project for several reasons:

•       Active citizen involvement: It directly involves residents in the creation and management of community gardens, which is in line with CIVICGREEN’s goal of improving active citizenship and participation in environmental protection.

•       Civic education and competences: the workshops and counselling offered in ‚Bujna Warszawa’ can exemplify the development of ecological skills and knowledge, which corresponds to the CIVICGREEN competences framework.

•       Potential for transfer and sustainability: Practices and experiences gained through this programme can be transferred to other cities or regions, which is important for the CIVICGREEN project seeking to spread knowledge and active engagement on a wider scale.

•       Support for communities and NGOs: The programme supports various community groups and organisations, which is in line with the CIVICGREEN project’s target group of citizens, adult educators and associations and NGOs.

•       Innovative approach to environmental protection: ‚Bujna Warszawa’ demonstrates how innovative urban initiatives can contribute to environmental protection, which is an inspiration for other European projects such as CIVICGREEN.

Related links Website of the good practice:

http://bujnawarszawa.pl/en/

 

Other related resources that have been developed and are available online:

https://pl.thegreencities.eu/trend-na-community-gardens-czyli-o-tym-jak-budowac-zielona-spolecznosc/ (an article on the community garden trend with a focus on the ‚Bujna Warszawa’ programme)

http://bujnawarszawa.pl/ogrody/ (map of the community gardens)

 

Good Practice 2 ECO-MIASTO Project
Brief description of good practice ECO-MIASTO is a Polish nationwide program, popularizing the idea of sustainable urban development. ECO-MIASTO is a competition for local governments, workshops, an expert publication and a conference. The program was launched in 2013 and has gained popularity as an initiative uniting city around pro-environmental solutions. The involvement of the French Embassy facilitates the exchange of experience between local governments from Poland and France, stimulating discussion on universal ideas of people- and environment-friendly urban centres.

 

Duration: The project has been going on for several years, specifically since 2013, with competitions and awards given annually.

 

Aims: The main goals of the project are to promote sustainable urban development, exchange experiences between cities, promote the best green solutions, involve residents and democratic participation of citizens for the environment.

 

Implementation: Cities across Poland submit their initiatives in various categories (e.g., closed-loop economy, energy efficiency). Winners are selected based on the innovation and efficiency of the solutions implemented.

Target group of the good practice The project is mainly aimed at local and municipal governments, as well as their residents. There are no specific age restrictions, but the project is particularly valuable for those responsible for urban planning and environmental management, as well as active citizens involved in local environmental issues.
Partners / Actors of good practice Stakeholders/Partners:

Local governments, city administrations, environmental organizations, companies and businesses, as well as city residents, French Embassy in Poland.

 

Reasons for cooperation:

Local governments and city administrations are direct beneficiaries of the project, implementing environmental solutions in their cities. Environmental organizations and companies often provide expertise, technology and financial support. City residents are key to implementing and sustaining these initiatives, and their involvement increases environmental awareness and influences project success. The French Embassy’s involvement facilitates the exchange of experience between local governments from Poland and France, stimulating discussion of universal ideas for people- and environment-friendly urban centres.

Success factors and difficulties / barriers to good practice Success factors

Key success factors of this good practice include extensive cross-sector cooperation, involvement of local communities, innovation of implemented solutions, effective exchange of experience between cities, and continuous adaptation of projects to current environmental needs and challenges.

 

Difficulties / Barriers

The main challenges in the context of this good practice are the budgetary constraints of local governments, the need for long-term planning and coordination, the diversity of needs and expectations of local communities, and the need to convince residents of changes in sustainability.

How can this good practice be linked to the CIVIC GREEN project, its scope and its activities? The ECO-MIASTO project can be inspiring for the CIVICGREEN project because of its promotion of active involvement of citizens in environmental issues, which coincides with CIVICGREEN’s goals. This example shows how citizens and local institutions can be effectively involved in environmental activities, which is key to CIVICGREEN. The ECO-MIASTO project promotes sustainable urban development by engaging citizens and local governments in innovative environmental projects. This model of cooperation and involvement could be useful for CIVICGREEN, especially in the context of forming expert groups and educating citizens about environmental policies. The project demonstrates the potential for transfer and sustainability of good practices, and could serve as a model for initiatives like CIVICGREEN in engaging citizens and strengthening their role in shaping environmental policies.
Related links Website of the good practice:

https://www.eco-miasto.pl/

 

Other related resources that have been developed and are available online:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLkjYxJyx_BJUaWeQH8CEDXQJ_IgMqVUZh (YouTube playlist containing videos about the ECO-MIASTO project, recordings of conferences, etc.)

https://www.eco-miasto.pl/media/publications/62e27cce9322c_Przewodnik_dobrych_praktyk_2019.pdf (Good practice guide for environmental projects implemented in Polish municipalities, available in 3 languages: Polish, English and French)

Tools

Tool 1 G1000
Brief description of the tool G1000 is a Belgian initiative that aims to foster citizen participation and deliberative democracy. It organizes large-scale citizen assemblies where randomly selected individuals come together to discuss and deliberate on important societal issues. The goal is to provide a platform for citizens to have a direct say in shaping policies and decisions
Target group of the tool The primary target group for the G1000 initiative includes Belgian citizens who are interested in actively participating in the democratic process through deliberative forums. G1000 assemblies are designed to be inclusive and representative of a diverse range of citizens, ensuring that various perspectives are taken into account.
The tool is developed by … The G1000 initiative was developed by a group of Belgian citizens, academics, and activists who were inspired by similar initiatives around the world. It is a grassroots movement that seeks to promote citizen engagement in the democratic process.
How this tool can be related to CIVIC GREEN Project and its scope and activities? The CivicGreen project and the G1000 initiative share common goals and principles related to citizen engagement and participation in democratic processes, with a particular focus on environmental issues. Here’s how the two initiatives can be related:

– Common Goal of Promoting Active Citizenship: Both initiatives aim to promote active citizenship by providing platforms for citizens to engage in meaningful discussions and participate in decision-making processes.

– Environmental Focus: The CivicGreen project specifically targets environmental issues, seeking to improve citizens’ knowledge about these matters and engage them in monitoring environmental policies and projects. This aligns closely with one of the main goals of the G1000 initiative.

– Deliberative Democracy: Both initiatives embrace elements of deliberative democracy, wherein citizens come together to discuss, deliberate, and contribute to policy-making.

– Citizen-Led Engagement: Both projects emphasize citizen-led engagement, recognizing that the insights, perspectives, and expertise of citizens are valuable assets in the decision-making process.

– Stakeholder Collaboration: Both initiatives may involve collaboration with various stakeholders, including public institutions, NGOs, and academic institutions, to ensure that the best possible information and resources are available to citizens.

– Enhancing Civic Knowledge: They provides a platform for citizens to deepen their understanding of various societal issues, including environmental ones, through deliberative processes.

– Empowering Citizens in Policy Monitoring: CivicGreen seeks to actively engage citizens in monitoring environmental policies and projects. The G1000 initiative, through its assemblies, can empower citizens to voice their opinions and concerns about policies, which can contribute to the monitoring and evaluation process.

Related links Access website of the tool:

https://www.g1000.org/en

 

Other related resources that this tool is based on:

The website typically provides updates about upcoming G1000 events, news related to citizen participation, and other relevant information. G1000 often publishes reports and materials summarizing the outcomes of their citizen assemblies and providing insights into the deliberative process.

 

Tool 2 CitizenLab
Brief description of the tool CitizenLab is an online platform designed to facilitate citizen participation and engagement in local governance. It provides a digital space for citizens to contribute ideas, participate in surveys, and engage in discussions about local issues and projects. The platform aims to bridge the gap between citizens and local governments, allowing for more transparent and collaborative decision-making processes.
Target group of the tool The primary target group for the CitizenLab platform includes citizens residing in specific municipalities or regions where the platform has been implemented. It is designed to be accessible to a wide range of individuals, from residents interested in local affairs to community groups and organizations seeking to actively participate in shaping their communities.

The platform is available in 7 different languages (FR, NL, DE, EN, PL, ES, DK).

The tool is developed by … CitizenLab is a civic tech company founded by Wietse Van Ransbeeck, Aline Muylaert, and Koen Gremmelprez. It was established with the mission of creating tools to empower citizens and improve the democratic process by fostering citizen participation.

CitizenLab is an “open source” platform, by opening up their code, they are practicing what they preach and strengthening community engagement by increasing transparency. As a company dedicated to making a positive social impact, CitizenLab also prioritise purpose over profit. Being open-source means continue to remove barriers to participation and give even more communities access to the platform.

How this tool can be related to CIVIC GREEN Project and its scope and activities? The CitizenLab platform and the CivicGreen project share a common goal of promoting active citizenship and engagement in environmental issues. Here’s how they can be related:

– Promoting Active Citizenship: Both CitizenLab and CivicGreen aim to promote active citizenship by providing platforms for citizens to participate in discussions and decision-making processes. While CitizenLab focuses on local governance, CivicGreen addresses environmental issues at a broader European level.

– Engagement in Environmental Issues: CivicGreen specifically targets environmental awareness and engagement among European citizens. CitizenLab, on the other hand, can be used by local governments to engage citizens in discussions about local environmental initiatives and projects.

– Improving Knowledge on Environmental Issues: CivicGreen seeks to improve the knowledge of European citizens and public institutions on environmental issues. CitizenLab, by facilitating discussions and providing information on local projects, can contribute to citizens’ understanding of how environmental policies are implemented at the local level.

– Conditions for Civic and Democratic Participation: Both initiatives aim to improve conditions for civic and democratic participation.

– Monitoring Environmental Policies: CivicGreen emphasizes the active engagement of European citizens in monitoring environmental policies and projects. CitizenLab, if used by local governments to discuss and implement environmental initiatives, can contribute to this monitoring process at the local level.

– Collaboration with Public Institutions: Both initiatives may involve collaboration with public institutions. CivicGreen may work directly with European institutions, while CitizenLab provides a platform for local governments to engage with citizens.

Related links Access website of the tool:

https://www.citizenlab.co/fr-be

Other related resources that this tool is based on:

Demo or Trial Access: Depending on the platform’s policies, there may be options for requesting a demo or accessing a trial version of the CitizenLab platform.

 

Resources

Resource 1 DEMOCRATIC ENGAGEMENT AFTER TWO SUMMITS FOR DEMOCRACY – REPORT
Short description of the resource Aim: The report aims to document the process initiated by the first summit and tasks implemented during the following Year of Action. This Report seeks to contribute to the success of the Summit for Democracy process by drawing lessons from the Year of Action and Second Summit and presenting opportunities for shaping an inclusive and effective Third Summit for Democracy in South Korea, due to take place in 2024.

Short Description:

In December 2021, the US President hosted the First Summit for Democracy and this was followed by a Year of Action. On 29 and 30 March 2023, the United States co-hosted the Second Summit for Democracy with the governments of Costa Rica, the Netherlands, South Korea and Zambia. The Summit for Democracy process remains a welcome effort for the international democracy support community, as it provides democracy actors a much-needed opportunity to raise democracy on the political agenda and come together to discuss collective solutions.

Target group of the resource Overall, 120 countries were invited to the Second Summit. All 112 countries invited to the First Summit were also asked to participate in 2023. In addition, eight new countries were invited to the Second Summit (Gramer 2023). Of the 120 countries who were asked to participate, 42 were European, 28 were from the Americas, 26 from the Asia-Pacific region, 22 from Africa and 2 from the Middle East.
The resource is published/broadcasted by … DEMOCRATIC ENGAGEMENT AFTER TWO SUMMITS FOR DEMOCRACY Reviewing the Impact and Providing some Reflections for the Future was published with contributions from the International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA), which can be viewed on the Summit for Democracy News and Resources Portal, funded by the European Union.
How this resource can be related to CIVIC GREEN Project and its scope and activities? Summit for Democracy has the potential to develop into a significant and regular global movement, but certain adaptations should be implemented to ensure that the momentum of the summit is not only maintained but amplified, enabling the continuation of existing good practices and the establishment of new ones. The Summit for Democracy process remains a welcome effort for the international democracy support community, as it provides democracy actors a much-needed opportunity to raise democracy on the political agenda and come together to discuss collective solutions. This process entails valuable lessons for Democratic Engagement that are relevant for CIVICGREEN.
Related links Website of the resource:

https://www.idea.int/sites/default/files/publications/democratic-engagement-after-two-summits-for%20democracy-en.pdf

 

Resource 2 Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave
Short description of the resource Aim:

The report aims to compile close to 300 representative deliberative practices to explore trends in deliberative processes where public authorities from all levels of government convene groups of people representing a wide cross-section of society, identify different models, and analyse the trade-offs among different design choices as well as the benefits and limits of public deliberation.

Short Description:

Innovative Citizen Participation explores the innovative ways that governments can effectively engage with citizens and stakeholders to source ideas, co-create solutions, and tackle complex policy problems. It focuses on new research in the area of deliberative, collaborative, and participatory decision making that are evolving across the globe. It documents how deliberative processes are used to tackle complex policy problems ranging from climate change to infrastructure investment decisions.

Target group of the resource The OECD report target public authorities from all levels of the government, civic engagement NGOs, democracy researchers and a wider range of public interested in a productive deliberation on issues of crucial significance like public infrastructure, climate change, etc.
The resource is published/broadcasted by … This work is published under the responsibility of the Secretary-General of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).  It can be accessed on the OECD library: OECD (2020), Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions: Catching the Deliberative Wave, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en.
How this resource can be related to CIVIC GREEN Project and its scope and activities? The OECD has identified 12 models of deliberative processes, clustered under four types of purpose: (1) informed citizen recommendations on policy questions; (2) citizen opinion on policy questions; (3) informed citizen evaluation of ballot measures, and (4) permanent deliberative models.

Public authorities from all levels of government increasingly turn to Citizens’ Assemblies, Juries, Panels and other representative deliberative processes to tackle complex policy problems ranging from climate change to infrastructure investment decisions. There is useful linkage between this resource and CIVICGREEN.

Related links Website of the resource:

https://www.oecd.org/governance/innovative-citizen-participation/